
Ironically, at least this time, better than you might think!

Ironically, at least this time, better than you might think!
Who died in the line of duty, ten years ago.
In
my partial blog-writing absence (though in case you’re worried, all is well
here in Astoria, Queens, post storm — we’re high and dry and with electricity)
I wanted to feature a few promising up-and-coming researchers I’m excited about.
The first of the young-upstart rising-star whipper-snappers is Jan
Haldipur (his email). Jan, an
ethnographer from upstate New York,is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at the CUNY Graduate Center. He’s researching how the NYPD’s Stop, Question,
and Frisk policies affect people in a South Bronx neighborhood.
I
had a few beers with Jan the other week, and (when I wasn’t trying to impress
him with inferior Dutch-language skills) we got to talking about taking
field notes. When I was a cop, being required to carry paper and pen makes initial note
taking comparatively easy, at least during down-times. But if you’re doing research
with people who, to put it politely, are more questioning of authority, whipping out a notepad can be rather
conspicuous in a head turning and even potentially dangerous kind of way. And yet, memory
being what it is, a researcher needs to take notes. Jan discovered a great way
around the dilemma. These are Jan Haldipur’s words:
Perched
on the top of a bench in a small courtyard nestled in the South Bronx’s Jackson
Houses, I sat with “Chaz,” one of my contacts in the neighborhood. It was my
first month in the field. With temperatures nearing the triple digits, we clung
to the shady side of the bench, nearest the trees. As I sat, wiping the sweat
from my brow, he told me about a recent argument he had with his grandmother. Not
wanting to miss some of the key details, I clumsily pulled a notepad out of my
back pocket.Chaz
stopped mid-story and asked me what I was doing.Jan:
I have to write some of this stuff down…remember? Like we talked about.Chaz:
I know that much…but you looking like the Feds with that notebook [laughs]. You
see everybody looking at us now?Feeling
as if time had just stopped, I looked up to see that we were on the receiving
end of a set of glares from a group of teens sitting on an adjacent bench.In
an attempt to stay true to my ethnographic forefathers, I had been jotting down
notes in shorthand. Deep in the recesses of countless seminal ethnographies,
one can usually find a footnote or appendix detailing the experiences one has
collecting data. Everyone from Whyte to Venkatesh [ed note: and Moskos], it seems, has shared
personal anecdotes on finding odd moments to jot down notes of what they
observed, heard and felt. What these texts seemed to gloss over, however, is
just how conspicuous one can look with a pen and pad in 2012.Not
wanting to make the situation any more uncomfortable than it was already
becoming, I fumbled around in my pocket and pulled out my iPhone, opened the “notes” section and began typing. In an age when most teens and 20-somethings
remain glued to their i-devices, checking mail, or texting, I found that my
fiddling with a phone while talking to Chaz was no longer “curious” behavior. In
fact, it was seen as quite normal.Over
the next few weeks and months, meeting with Chaz and an assortment of other
community members, I made a conscious decision to leave my pen and pad at home.
Instead, I relied almost purely on my phone, and, situation permitting, a voice
recorder. The core of the “ethnographic process” remains intact. The means to
achieve change with the times.
The
iPhone! It’s the kind of brilliant yet simple observation I love. And hopefully it will help other researchers out there in the field.
[Update: In November, 2012, I was in Chicago for the ASC conference and was riding the Green Line on W. Lake Street toward the loop around 1AM (my, how Chicago has changed since I grew up there). There was one other person in the L car, an African-American man about my age at the other end of the car. I was standing up, in the middle of the car, checking out the fancy new L car. I was scribbling notes in my pad (as I am wont to do). The other guy got upset and told me to, “Stop doing that cop shit!” I told him I was a writer. We ended up on decent terms.]
If Cannibal Cop is a minus point or two (you just don’t see headlines like this too often)… there’s “hero cop” to counterbalance the bad (or, as one of my students said while watching the video of him holding his bullet wound while shooting the criminal: “Damn, he’s going O.G.!”)
I guess, for the NYPD, that makes the day kind of a wash.
And this one is a big one. Heriberto Lazcano, the founder and the principal leader of the Zetas. Perhaps he’s even the big one. The real kingpin. I guess we won. Ten times is the charm.
Let’s savor our victory and bask in a new drug-free world.
Update: the body was stolen.
Great description of a police officer, from a student’s paper: “An individual that does things at his or her own pace while trying to make the job interesting for sanity’s sake, all the while not getting killed by doing it.”

Since I’m still keeping track, I thought I’d share.
A Colombian woman known as “the queen of cocaine” was murdered earlier this month. But she was murdered, not killed or captured by the good guys. (Plus technically, she would be a Queenpin, which sounds kind of funny.) So I’m not counting her. So it’s been awhile since the wheels of justice have crushed one of these evil-doer kingpins.
Luckily today I woke up today to see the amazing news that we’ve captured Ivan Velazquez Caballero. I mean this guy is known as El Taliban. It doesn’t get much badder than that! So by my count he’s the ninth “kingpin”we’ve put out of business in just the past two years. Of this guy, the BBC says: “He is believed to have controlled some of the most important drug routes
into the United States and ruled them with cold brutality.” Wowzahs! Mark those drug routes closed, shut, and done!
So… how’s that drug war going?
In Mexico 50,000 have been killed. But perhaps more than 100,000. With so many bad guys being eliminated by friend and foe, soon the streets will be safe!
As you may (or may not) have noticed, this blog has been on long-term hiatus. For now, not writing blog posts is more fun than writing them. Besides, I have other things to write, some of which might actually get me paid. Speaking of which, Cop in the Hood is still selling (just topped 20,000 to date), and In Defense of Flogging will hopefully pick-up in the soon-to-be released paperback edition.
In the meantime, school has started, my wife and I are healthy and happy, and life is good. (Also, I’m thrilled to read today that my old academy instructor and friend, Agent Gene Cassidy, finally got a life-saving liver transplant!)
I suspect I’ll post here again every now and then… but who knows?
In the meantime, stay safe and root for the O’s!
Maybe I’ve become a bit cynical after my time in New York, but I don’t normally think of the police union as a good source for rational and cost-effective advice on better policing (though protecting workers’ rights is an important part of the union).
But I’ve got to hand it to Robert Cherry, president of my old Baltimore Fraternal Order of Police for their Blueprint for Improving Policing. (But Bob, I’m still a bit peeved that my name is misspelled as “Moslos” on my FOP, Lodge #3 card! You can send a replacement to my school address.) [The FOP is one of the major police unions. The other, which represents the NYPD, is the PBA. In my mind the FOP is somewhat better about caring for the police and the public. The PBA has a bad history of stoking public fear, which isn’t really in anybody’s best long-term interests.)
From the FOP report:
Our police officers are appalled by those individuals who betrayed their oath and have now pled guilty in the Majestic Towing scandal, along with others which have come to light in recent years. Many now feel embarrassed to tell others they work for the BPD. The rank and file officers attribute this scandal directly to the lax hiring practices of the BPD.
Specifically, maybe it wasn’t a very bright idea to go poach officers from what an incredibly corrupt Puerto Rican police department.
The FOP report continues:
The approximate average number of officers suspended in the BPD is 80-100 at a time, which is more than half of the officers needed to staff an entire district.
…
Many officers took pride in being a police officer in one of the most challenging policing environments in America. This is simply not the reality anymore. Essentially, Baltimore city taxpayers are being duped. Their tax money is funding the training of Baltimore City police officers who, in turn, leave to work for other jurisdictions, including Baltimore County. The cost is more than just fiscal—taxpayers are losing protection and it’s a waste of resources in general. In addition to losing qualified police officers, according to in-service training surveys, not one Baltimore City police officer said he/she would recommend joining the BPD to potential applicants. At this moment, the Baltimore County Police Department has initiated a 50 member lateral class focusing on recruitment of Baltimore City officers with fewer that five years of experience.
…
A recent study shows that an increasing number of BPD officers live in Baltimore City. The BPD should make certain that the trend continues by offering incentives for police officers to live within the city limits. The greater the number of officers residing in the city, the more personally invested the police force as a whole will be in the welfare of the city.
The report also calls for getting rid of the “white shirts” (to be clear: just the shirts, not the people in them), a shockingly overdue redrawing of district and post boundaries, more patrol and more visible patrol, more focus on community focused policing and quality of life issues, a more productive (and less stat-and-blame) Comstat, and two years of college or military as a hiring requirement. It all makes a lot of sense. Kudos to the FOP.
I was interviewed by Videosurveillance.com about my thoughts on video surveillance’s effect on crime. I’m skeptical. (But impressed that a company such as theirs is willing to print my unadulterated skepticism.)
Cameras are no substitute of cops.