Tag: police shootings

  • Unarmed man kills police officer

    This happened back in March, so it’s not news. But still, the number of similarities between this case and the killing of Michael Brown are interesting, especially if you are one of those who think that “unarmed” suspects cannot ever really threaten police officers to the point where lethal force might be necessary.

    Here’s gist: An unarmed man attacks Johnson City, NY, police officer Dave Smith when Officer Smith is still in his a police car. This guy, Clark, gets control of the officer’s gun and kills the cop. Then the killer gets shot six times by another cop. Then, after being shot six times by another cop, the killer fights that second cop, who shoots him two more times. Now, after being hit by eight .40-caliber rounds, the cop killer grabs the second’s cops gun, rendering it inoperable after another bullet flies into a church parking lot. Two civilians help the cop and three of them manage, with difficulty, to handcuff Clark. Clark fought and ranted all the way to the hospital.

    From the Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin:

    When [Officer} Smith arrived, witnesses said, Clark rushed out to the police cruiser, approaching it from behind. It was unclear who opened the door, but Clark began fighting with Smith as soon as the patrolman exited his vehicle, witnesses said.

    One witness told police Smith was still sitting in the car and just starting to get out when Clark punched him in the head. Smith tried to push the door open in an attempt to get out, and the two began to struggle.

    Within seconds, Clark was on top of Smith, holding his service weapon.

    “I saw the man practically inside the cop car driver’s door — on top of the cop,” a witness who was leaving work nearby about 7 a.m. that morning wrote in a deposition. “It looked like he was punching and swinging at the cop.”

    [Officer] Smith weighed 205 pounds and was 6 feet 2 inches tall, according to reports, while Clark weighed 225 pounds and stood 5 feet 10 inches.

    Clark fired two shots at [Officer] Smith’s head, killing him instantly.

    Once Officer Cioci could take a clear shot, he fired 10 shots at Clark, striking him six times in the torso, leg and face.

    Clark fell to the ground. Then he climbed back to his knees, ranting.

    When [Officer] Cioci approached Clark, [Clark] grabbed the officer by the leg and pulled him face-down to the pavement where the two began to wrestle.

    Clark climbed onto Cioci’s back, reaching around to his front in an attempt to grab the service weapon, police reports state. The officer pushed himself off the ground with one arm while using the other to fire at Clark, striking him a seventh and eighth time, both in the torso.

    After he was struck the eighth time, reports state, Clark inserted a finger into the trigger guard of Cioci’s weapon, sending a bullet into a nearby church parking lot but rendering the gun inoperable because his hold of the weapon interfered with the recoil action.

    “It took all three people to handcuff Clark, who was still fighting, eyes open and ranting the entire time.” [Even as he went into the ER.]

    The entire incident took place in less than five minutes, according to police reports.

    In a great understatement, Chief Zikuski added that Clark’s behavior “after being hit by eight shots from a .40-caliber weapon is also unusual.”

    Had Officer Smith managed to maintain control of his gun and had he shot and killed Clark, would the headlines have said, “Cop Kills Unarmed Man”? This is pretty similar to what happened to Darren Wilson, except, according to Wilson’s testimony, Wilson managed to retake control of his gun and shoot the suspect. Officer Smith, rest in peace, wasn’t so lucky. He was killed by an unarmed man.

  • S.C. State Trooper arrested for bad shooting

    Here’s me on Chris Hayes last night talking about the shooting of Levar Jones.

    And yeah, that’s my bolo tie. You got a problem with a little New Mexico sunshine on TV? Didn’t think so.

    Update: The officer pled guilty

  • Reporter fired for politically incorrect editorializing

    With regards to the killing of Jersey City Police Officer Melvin Santiago, Fox News TV reporter Sean Bergin no longer has a job after editorializing on-air:

    It’s important to shine a light on this racist mentality that has so contaminated policing and America’s inner-cities. … The underlying cause for all of this, of course, is America’s racist criminal justice system that makes it impossible for young black men to succeed. It’s nearly impossible to cover the issue in-depth and accurately when surrounded by stark raving conservatives who masquerade as journalists.

    Just kidding.

    Bergin didn’t say that. And he didn’t work for Fox. The truth is, if he had said that, it’s very unlikely he would have been fired. He was fired for editorializing in a conservative manner, based on his what he’s seen as a reporter.

    What Bergin actually said on-air was:

    We were besieged, flooded with calls from police officers furious that we would give media coverage to the life of a cop killer. It’s understandable. We decided to air it because it’s important to shine a light on the anti-cop mentality that has so contaminated America’s inner cities. This same, sick, perverse line of thinking is evident from Jersey City, to Newark and Patterson to Trenton.

    It has made the police officer’s job impossible, and it has got to stop. The underlying cause for all of this, of course: young black men growing up without fathers. Unfortunately, no one in the news media has the courage to touch that subject.

    Do I agree with this? Not one-hundred percent, but he certainly brings up a fair issue. Is what he said overly simplistic? Of course. But let’s not set the bar too high for local TV news. This sure beats another cute animal video. And don’t give me that “reporters shouldn’t have an opinion” bit. Or “there’s a time a place for everything.” This was a great time and place to express his opinion on a major problem.

    Bergin later told The Blaze(and then it was picked up by the AP and other news sites):

    I broke the rules, but I broke the rules because I was doing the right thing. You can’t fix a problem if you don’t talk about the problem. The truth is, 73 percent of African-American children grow up without fathers. It’s a topic that needs to be handled delicately — and really, this situation could have been used as a way to explore that.

    Now that 73 percent figure isn’t true and a reporter should know better than to throw around misleading statistics. (There’s a big difference between not having legally married parents living together at time of birth and “growing up without a father.” Regardless, the comparable figure for whites is 29 percent.) But still, Bergin’s greater point is valid: there’s a problem here; we need to talk about it and get to the bottom of it.

    Bergin went on:

    “I’m in these housing projects all the time, and it’s all for the same thing: black men slaughtering each other in the streets. Why is this happening?” he continued, adding that it’s nearly impossible to cover the issue in-depth and accurately when surrounded by “stark raving liberals who masquerade as journalists.”

    OK, strike two again Bergin for using the phrase “stark-raving liberal.” But I’ll give him credit for this: his opinions come from actually visiting the homes and neighborhoods where the violence happens. He sees bad things happening and actually cares. Before you criticize him, ask yourself if you care. Think about the last time you’ve done anything in a high-crime neighborhood other than lock your car doors.

    As I wrote in Cop in the Hood:

    If you really want to learn about the ghetto, go there. There’s probably one near you. Visit a church; walk down the street; buy something from the corner store; have a beer; eat. But most importantly, talk to people. That’s how you learn. When the subject turns to drugs and crime, you’ll hear a common refrain: “It just don’t make sense.”

    Bergin did all this. Reality, as cops well know, isn’t always politically correct. And you don’t have to like what what he says to defend his right to say it.

  • Wife of Melvin Santiago’s killer wishes husband had killed more cops

    Wife of Melvin Santiago’s killer wishes husband had killed more cops

    Melvin Santiago, a rookie Jersey City cop was killed — ambushed while sill inside his police car — responding to a 4am call for an armed robbery.

    Sometimes, after a cop is killed, (just between you and me) I think, “man, that cop messed up” (knowing full well that we all mess up some time). Other times I think, “Man, maybe the cop shouldn’t have been so eager to search that car, fishing to find drugs. If it weren’t for the war on drugs, that officer would still be alive.”

    Other times, like in this case, I just get sad and think, “There but for the grace of God go I.”

    Officer Santiago gets a call at 4am for a robbery. What cop hasn’t? He responds to the scene and is immediately shot and killed.

    The killer, a suspect in a previous homicide and with many previous arrests, first cut and took a gun from an armed Walgreens’ security guard. Apparently he then tried to kill the guard (but was perhaps foiled by the gun’s safety). He said, “I killed your security guard” and told a customer to watch the news because he was “going to be famous.”

    So instead of leaving, he lingers for four very long minutes, waiting for the cops to show up. When the first police car pulls up, he shoots and kills Santiago: “Bullets flew through the cruiser’s windshield, 13 in all. The suspect was shot multiple times, and officers slapped handcuffs on him.”

    This horrible story has been well reported, so I had nothing to add.

    But now we’ve got the words of the killer’s horrible wife. See the problem, according to her, wasn’t that her husband is a cold-blooded killer. No. The problem is that he didn’t kill more cops. Because apparently, in her twisted world view, a man has a right to go out robbing and killing without society being all judgmental.

    She says, in what may be the most twisted attempt for sympathy ever:

    He should have took more with him. If they was going to stand over my husband and shoot him like a fucking dog, he should have took more with him. That’s how I feel.

    Sorry for the officer’s family. That’s you know. Whatever. But at the end of the day he got a family too. All they care about is the officer. All they care about is the officer.

    Meanwhile, the mother of the Santiago poignantly stated the obvious:

    [The killer] is a piece of shit. My son was 23 years old and he was a good boy, and he didn’t deserve to get a bullet in his head for no reason. For just doing his job. It was his dream and … he didn’t have to die like that. All because somebody wanted to be famous.

    [thanks to anon]

    [see later post as well]

  • Republicans against bulletproof vests for cops

    The program to buy vests for cops started in 1999 under Clinton and the very pro-police vice president, Al Gore (not that most police officers every thanks either of them). But apparently, say Republicans, it’s against the constitution. From USA Today:

    Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., objected, blocking action on the program, as he did in 2012. Coburn said the Constitution gives the federal government no role in funding local police departments.

    The bill’s supporters include the Fraternal Order of Police, International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National Sheriff’s Association and the National Association of Police Organizations.

    The bill has 26 co-sponsors, but none are Republican.

    Just imagine, if you will, the right-wing / Fox News backlash if Obama came out against this. Though maybe Obama should come out against it, just so Republicans would support it…

    Why let saving the lives of police officers get in the way of your kookie right-wing ideology? For shame.

  • ABQ Police Protests

    “Check it out, esse…. shit’s going dowwwn.” (That’s an Albuqueque accent, just FYI, as dictated to me by my Albuquerquean wife).

    There are some anti-police protests in the Duke City.

    A police-involved shooting of James Boyd, caught on police video, sparked the protests.

    If you’re right wing, watch this version:

    If you’re left wing, watch this version (if you’re in the middle, watch the right-wing version because it provides more dialogue.):

    It’s also good to watch both versions and see the political convergence of right and left come together in the face of what is a pretty morally indefensible police-involved killing.

    Perhaps how this is how police are now trained, but I hope not. I do not like what I see.

    These are not effective tactics (though it worries me that the officers seem well trained). This shooting also demonstrates why we should not provide police with military weapons willy nilly. The police use almost every toy at their disposal. What’s the point of having less-lethal weaponry if you never get to use it? The desire to use less-lethal weaponry — flash grenade, dog, “bean bag”  — contributes to a bad death. When police shoot a guy with a knife (or two), I’m generally pretty sympathetic to police. But not in this case. I know the 15-foot rule, but this guy wasn’t about to go billy-goat ninja on the side of a mountain.

    First of all, and I know we didn’t see the first few hours, but this guy was complying. At least until police fired a less-lethal round near here. But regardless, one the guy is down, you can go up to the guy with a night stick and wack him if he moves. You don’t need to fire three less-lethal rounds at his ass and sick the dog on him. Sure, he might be playing possum, but I think you can assume he won’t be fighting at 100%, if you know what I mean. You’ve already shot him and you’ve got lethal cover.

    There’s something particularly morbid about shooting a dying guy with a bean bag and letting a dog bite him because he failed to comply… after you done shot him.

    I’ve written about this “hands-off” movement in police training, and I do not like it. When did cops become such wimps?

    I’m also not at all clear why police fired a flash grenade at a complying individual. In all seriousness, could somebody please explain to me what is the S.O.P. now in training and the use of flash grenades? Is compliance no longer enough to prevent use of force?

    Since 2010, ABQ police officers have been involved in 37 shootings, 23 of them fatal. By comparison, the NYPD has been involved in perhaps about 70 shootings since 2010. But, just to remind you, New York City has far more than 10 times the population of fair Albuquerque. In terms of police-involved shootings, Albuquerque is roughly on par with Baltimore, but Baltimore has much more crime.

    I think this was a bad shooting.

    But what really worries me is that perhaps the officers performed exactly as trained. If so, we need to change police training (and not make scapegoats of the officers).

  • Officer Down

    Yesterday an Eastern District sergeant, Keith McNeill, was shot and very seriously wounded. My thoughts go out to him, his family, and all those who know and work with him.

  • Civil trial in shooting of Jonathan Ayers begins

    Remember Jonathan Ayers? Probably not. But you should. In 2009 he was an shot dead by police in what was one of the worst police-involved shooting in American history. Seriously.

    It didn’t become a national scandal.

    It wasn’t even big news.

    But there was so much wrong. So much police did wrong — tactically and morally — it’s hard to get one’s head around how messed up this shooting was. It should be a case study of what not to as a police officers.

    To refresh your memory, Reverend Ayers was driving along and picked up Kayla Barrett. Barrett was a drug addict Ayers had known for years through his priestly duties. This time Barrett was being watched by undercover police. Ayers said some nice words and gave her “all the money he had on him“: $23. 

    Ayers then went to buy gas (probably with a credit card), and after paying inside, got back in his car. At this point he was bum-rushed by mean looking men with guns. Ayers had no idea they were cops. Nor did bystanders also said they thought they were witnessing a robbery. Ayers tried to drive away from his attackers and in doing so backed his car up into deputy, Chance Oxner, who, like a fool, put himself into a position where a car could back up into him. After Ayers starting going forward and driving away, shots were fired at Ayers car. Ayers was shot and killed by a police officer. The officer who killed Ayers was not certified to carry a gun. According to the paramedic who treated Ayers, Ayers asked, “Who shot me?

    Brian Rickman, the district attorney, failed to convince a grand jury to bring charges against any of the officers involved. Rickman may have not been trying to hard as he was close friends (like pallbearer close) with the unit’s commanding officer, Kyle Bryan.

    [Distraction: Police first tried to justify the shooting by discrediting Ayers. Police threatened to arrest Barrett if she didn’t admit she was having an affair with Ayers. Barrett first told police what they wanted to hear, but then quite convincingly recanted:

    “I’m an addict,” 26-year-old Kayla Barrett admitted Tuesday, saying that Ayers was ministering to her on the day of his death. “I’ve known him awhile – about six or seven years,” she said, calling him “a pastor and a friend.” She said that, over time, Ayers had been lecturing her and trying to get her to straighten out her life and to get off drugs. “I’ve been doing drugs for nine years,” Barrett said, noting that she is addicted to cocaine – “crack, basically.”

    Barrett said she asked Ayers if he could help her out with the back rent, and that he gave “all the money he had on him” – $23. “His last words to me were I didn’t owe him anything,” Barrett said. “Probably 15-20 minutes after that I could hear the shots.” Responding to allegations she has heard, she said, “No, we did not have sex – I’m not capable,” referring to her Aug. 22 miscarriage.

    “He [Ayers] doesn’t have any part in any kind of drug activity,” Barrett insisted. “He’s never solicited me for prostitution. I don’t do that.” “I’ve never been charged with prostitution,” she said. Barrett said Ayers knew her fiancé and stopped to talk to him or her whenever and wherever he saw them and that he had stopped by the motel in the past. “He had been by there before,” she said. “He knew my fiancé also. I didn’t see him very much – about every two months.”

    The issue of their relationship is irrelevant to the shooting, but I do think it’s worth pointing out that Ayers was actually a priest doing priestly good. Police eventually admitted that Ayers was not doing anything illegal and was never part of their investigation. Absurdly, Harrison later testified that Ayers was free to leave if he did not wish to respond to questions when police approached his car. Anyway…]

    As I previously wrote:

    It’s the totality of the situation that bothers me. It’s not just that they were shooting at a car driving away (though that bothers me too). It’s everything. It’s choosing this location to stop and question the man. It’s using plainclothes officers to do so. It’s coming with gun drawn. It’s putting yourself behind a car that just might want to get away. These are all bad choices. Had the police just make one good choice, none of this would have happened.

    I blame the officers for the bad choices they made: 1) approaching Ayers armed, 2) approaching in plain clothes, 3) not making in clear they were police, 4) approaching Ayers when he was in his car and yet 5) not doing a normal car stop, 6) placing themselves in harm’s way behind the car, and 7) shooting at a car driving away (in a gas station, no less).

    Hey, we all make mistakes. And I’ll always give police the benefit of the doubt. But when you make that many mistakes and you end up killing an innocent man, I think you should be punished.

    and:

    Turns out that Billy Shane Harrison, the officer who killed Ayers, didn’t (and doesn’t) actually have police powers. He let his firearm training lapse. Oops (and from TV news).

    Maybe if this drug officer had had proper training, oh, I don’t know, he could have figured a better tactical way of stopping an innocent man for questioning without causing a situation where a good man gets killed while trying to get away from armed men he didn’t know were police!

    Now we don’t need to get into another debate about the shooting. But all you fools (I mean folks) who think this killing was somehow justified, ask yourself this: Can you imagine any police-involved shooting that isn’t justified? (short of cold-blood premeditated murder–which this was not.)

    It’s one thing to say, “Cops sometimes make mistakes. And sometimes a whole bunch of dumb-ass mistakes. And sometimes they comes together and, well, sorry. But mistakes aren’t crimes and we always need to give police the benefit of the doubt.” OK, fair enough. But if you go beyond that and think that all police-involved shootings are justified, then why even have this discussion?

    Well now, a civil trial has begun, four-and-a-half years later.

    There are a lot of names here and it’s confusing because they’re all tied together, but that’s part of the tragedy. Here’s the cast of characters (and do correct me if I’m wrong).

    Jonathan Ayers (killed) was shot by Billy Shane Harrison. Who may have not been certifiedunder Georgia law to carry a weapon at the time. Brian Rickman was the district attorney and friend of Kyle Bryant (who has since died of natural causes). Bryant was the commander of the drug task force that included Harrison and Oxner.

    Lt. Edwin Wilson was a training officer who said he had trained Harrison, but didn’t. Wilson was appointed by Sheriff Randy Shirley. Shirley, who has been reelected, later fired Wilson after Wilson was arrested and charged with a felony for lying about Harrison’s firearm training.

    I’m going to quote hotrod’s (slightly edited) comment from a previous post. And many thanks to hotrod for this update, or else I would not have know the latest.

    This case is still, in my mind, the gold standard for a buffonery-driven police-involved shooting. The three cops did NOTHING right. When they were left with a body on the ground (actually a surgical ward), the whitewash began.

    As others have noted, everything was driven by the totality of circumstances. And to take a hard look (not necessarily a criminal charge) at the totality of circumstances, you have to take a very hard look at Kyle Bryant, the commander of the alphabet soup task force and THE DRIVER OF THE SUV that tried to box in Ayers.

    Kyle Bryant was hired in mid-2009. Brian Rickman, the local DA, said in referring to Bryant – “I put my reputation on this – (he’s) as good as you will ever find.” (That was in the Clayton (GA) Tribune o/a April 16 2009. The URL has gone dead, but I guess someone in the area could do the legwork if they really wanted.)

    (Sidenote – why is a DA this closely involved in LE hiring? Honest question.)

    Kyle Bryant died Nov 25th, 2012, apparently of natural causes.

    Note that Brian Rickman was one of the pallbearers.

    I sincerely hope that Kyle Bryant is at peace. I’m playing with rhetorical fire a little bit in mentioning his death, and I note it here only to point out how close he appears to have been with Brian Rickman.

    Consider that between the time he staked his reputation on Kyle Bryant being as good as they come and the time where he was honored as a pallbearer, Brian Rickman was able to summon up enough objectivity to be the only non-civil law voice Abbie Ayers and her baby had to speak for Johnathan Ayers.

    Awesome. Just awesome. Good job Mr. Rickman.

    Jonathan Ayers is dead. Abbie Ayers a widow, and her son never met his father. Kyle Bryant is dead. I can’t imagine the aftermath of a police-involved shooting, particularly THIS police-involved shooting, did anything for his quality of life in his last couple of years. Billy Shane Harrison, who hadn’t done his training, is no longer a cop. Chance Oxner has gone in the space of a few years from being a task force commander (Bryant’s predecessor) to a burglary investigator (check the Habersham County Sheriff’s website). The training officer handpicked by Sherrif Randy Shirley, Edwin Wilson, was charged with a felony, fired, and apparently got a plea with no jail time.

    But the two sheriffs (Shirley of Stephens County and Terrell of Habersham) and the DA on watch (Rickman) during this absolute grade-A freak show have all been reelected, and it took more than four years to get this case to trial.

    Update (Feb 23, 2014): Jury awards widow $2.3 million. And I guess that is that…. The end.

  • Cop Down at MIT

    Cop Down at MIT

    Can we make a new rule for killers?

    “Know your victims.”

    It may not help the victim, but it does help everybody else.

    Update 12:15am: Word is the officer has died. I think it’s safe to assume this is the first MIT police officer to be killed in the line of duty.

    My condolences and sincere hopes this situation resolves itself without any other good person being hurt or killed.

    Another Update: This is the part that always gets me choked up: “A Wilmington, Mass., police car carrying what appear to be family
    members arrived sirens blaring. A few Officers arriving in tears.”

    A couple of days agoI tweeted this: A nice ode to Boston, from one of the many who frolicked in The Hub. http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/you-may-leave-boston-but-boston-never-leaves-you/275018/