Tag: prohibition

  • Don’t snort the white heroin!

    Don’t snort the white heroin!

    So a few months ago in Amsterdam, a couple British tourists died from a drug overdose. The Brits are kind of like the canaries in a coal mine of tourists. Brits are usually the first to somehow kill themselves, if given the opportunity. (It has to do with alcohol.)

    Anyway, they did die. It turned out that some guy on the street was selling heroin as cocaine. This is odd mostly because heroin is more expensive than cocaine, so the drug dealer probably didn’t know what he was selling. But the end result is people snorted heroin, many went the hospital, and a few died.

    So what do you as a tourist city do? Well most places would cover it up. Or make ads showing happy people having fun in the sun. Well there isn’t much sun here, but jokes aside, what they did in Amsterdam is very impressive. It’s what a rational drug policy looks like.

    First of all, hard drugs (heroin and cocaine) are illegal here. So you can’t go into a coffee shop and buy them. But as this city is a bit of a drug tourist destination, people come here wanting to do drugs. So like anywhere, they find a way to buy them.

    As I have written, police spend effort cracking down on fake drug sellers. But these real drugs. Prohibition deaths. Because both the buyer and seller thought they were buying and selling something else.

    So the city but up signs to warn tourists. It may seem like common sense, but what American city would do this? And it was an issue here too. I mean, who wants to see such signs in their beautiful city?




    Of course the campaign to warn tourist more than the actual deaths became international news. Is this good for the city’s image? Well, actually, probably, yes.

    And nobody else died. That’s kind of important.

    Here’s what the Mayor Van der Laan wrote on December 3, 2014. It’s very rational. It’s very Dutch:

    Cocaine alert and reputation

    For the past two months, seventeen predominantly young tourists fell victim to so-called ‘white heroin’. Heroin, sold as cocaine on the streets, that is much more dangerous and therefore potentially deadly. Three young Brits died. An indescribable loss to their family members and friends.

    People who say it is not allowed to use hard drugs are, of course, correct. Reality is, unfortunately, unruly. Many people do something illegal now and again. Even nice people, even people who could be our own family and friends. We cannot ignore that reality, and this is the foundation for our drug policy, which, at its core, takes drug usage as a health problem. Not criminalising it (as opposed to many other countries) makes room for education, safety testing and prevention. And this makes people who unexpectedly use too many or contaminated drugs, be able to apply for first aid, without worrying about being prosecuted.

    We hope the police will find the perpetrator soon. In the meantime, our campaign will continue. There are 35 matrix signs with warnings to tourists. We know most young weekend tourists often arrive on Thursdays or Fridays. Special teams distribute flyers at Amstel bus station, Central Station, Schiphol Airport, and in the city centre.

    In addition, we recommend the exclusion tests available at smartshops. They demonstrate whether or not you are dealing with heroin, but should not offer a false sense of security. This is why we are telling users very clearly that the test does not guarantee the drugs are safe to use.

    Tourists have let us know they appreciate these efforts. Many are surprised we openly warn them of the dangers these drugs entail. I get a lot of questions about that. Don’t you think it is bad for the city’s reputation, all those warning signs and (inter)national media attention? people want to know. The answer to that question is ‘no.’ I would find it bad for the city if we did not do this. Amsterdam wants to do everything to prevent new victims. That is the least we can do.

  • Is this what Prohibition was like?

    So there’s something very odd about this:

    According to the [New York City] Department of Health, New York University students were dispatched to gather shisha from of 13 hookah bars; after samples were analyzed, it was found that all 13 samples contained tobacco.

    Well I should hope so! You might find the same if you analyzed a pack of Marlboro Lights. The article goes on:

    “To know that tobacco was smoked inside these establishments, exposing hundreds to the dangers of secondhand smoke, is troubling,” Merle Myerson, the director of the Mount Sinai Roosevelt and St. Luke’s Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Program, said in a statement.

    To know that tobacco was smoked inside these establishments…“? These places are tobacco smoking bars. You might not like it. It might not be legal. But don’t be shocked. It’s not even like these places are even speakeasies. They’re shisha joints. That’s what you do: smoke tobacco.

    “Shisha” is tobacco smoked from a water pipe. Always has been. Always will be. (And hookah is just another word for shisha, though linguists and Arab-snobs like to look down on the more western childish word “hookah”. The brits sometimes call it “hubbly bubbly”. The Greeks call it “nargilé,” but gave up on it a while back, a few hipsters notwithstanding).

    There is a strip of shisha (and other middle-eastern) joins a few blocks from me, on Steinway Street. At least one of these shisha places has been here since long before me. Interestingly, though, most of the shisha joints appeared after the smoking ban took effect in NYC circa 2003. Most are still probably legal because smoking is permitted if (at least as I understand it) most of their income (80%?) comes from tobacco sales (an exception that was really meant for rich cigar bars). So yeah, if they also sell beer or dinner, it’s probably not allowed. But what shouldn’t be an issue is what “those people” are smoking. It’s not Soylent Green. It’s tobacco!

  • Garner’s Death

    I don’t have much to say because I wasn’t sitting on the grand jury. I have no new information. Apparently the good citizens of Staten Island have spoken. From the Daily News:

    After four months of reviewing the evidence, a majority on the panel
    concluded there was not enough there to charge Pantaleo with
    manslaughter, reckless endangerment or criminally negligent homicide. The 23-member grand jury, sources said, was comprised of 14 whites, with the rest being black or Hispanic.

    I wrote about Garner in the Daily News a few months ago and stand by it. And here’s everything I’ve blogged about the incident. And see this in the Times.

    I will add:

    A) I’m a bit surprised that the officer wasn’t indicted. My money would have been on an indictment.

    B) The cop is lucky as hell he killed a guy in Staten Island (as opposed to Brooklyn or the Bronx).

    C) I strongly suspect the officer is a dick. Now this isn’t based on fact but just my own small-minded prejudice. But from my limited experience policing, when you have a group of cops, the cop who first gets physical? The cop who jumps on an unarmed suspect? The cop who, with a half dozen other cops right there still deems it necessary to single-handedly take a guy down? Half a dozen other cops, smart cops, also there at the scene didn’t see a need to get physical right there and then. And one cop decides to get physical? And getting physical is a way you can’t get yourself cleanly out of? From my experience: 9 times out of 10 that cop, the most aggressive cop, is a dick. And 10 times out of 10 the cop who is most aggressive sets the tone for the entire incident.

    But being a dick isn’t a crime. Nor is a chokehold.

    D) But a chokehold is against departmental rules. That officer is now going to be f*cked by the department. It is written.

    E) And yet… I still keep thinking that a fat guy in horrible shape maybe shouldn’t make such a stupid choice as to actively resist arrest. The force stops when the resistance stops. He died. There seemed to be no intent to kill anybody. You might have bad policy, bad tactics, and a tragedy, but even all of that together doesn’t equal a crime.

    F) I would love for just one “progressive” liberal to come out against New York City’s crazy cigarettes taxes and prohibition against selling loosies (individual cigarettes). By one estimate (in the Bronx) 76%(!) of cigarettes are now bootlegged! Prohibition has consequences, particularly — historically and today — for minorities.

    I’m off to Mexico for a week. Comment nicely and stay safe.

  • Bootlegging: for cigarettes, alive and well in New York City

    Story in the New York Times:

    The toothpick pressed a hidden button that released a large magnet that kept a secret compartment locked. Deputy Davis lifted the front of the row of shelves like you would the trunk of a small car, and inside were rows and rows, all different brands, of contraband. Not narcotics or pills, but unopened packs of cigarettes, perfectly legal in the state in which they were bought, but not here. Hence the secret compartment.

    The moral here is simple. You need some enforcers, but we shouldn’t waste too many resources in regulating a legal product. When there’s a huge market bootlegging, then you need to lower taxes.

    Also, I suspect that smoking isn’t down as much as people think as a result of raising taxes. Because if The Man can’t find the cigarettes, than the public health expert things they aren’t being smoked.

    According to a great study by Klaus von Lampe (et al), my brilliant colleague:

    It was found that 76% of cigarette packs collected [by looking at litter… how cool is that?] avoided the combined New York City and State tax. More specifically, 57.9% were untaxed (counterfeit or bearing no tax stamp), for 15.8% taxes were paid outside of New York City (including other states and New York State only). Only 19.4% of tax stamps collected indicated that New York City and New York State taxes were paid…. The finding that the majority of cigarettes did not have a tax stamp or bore a counterfeit tax stamp suggests that these cigarettes were being bootlegged, most likely from Native American Reservations. It was found that 76.2% of cigarette packs collected avoided the combined New York City and State tax.

    And two words: Eric Garner.

  • Still of the Day

    Still of the Day

    Direct predecessor to DEA agents proudly displaying their prohibition victory. After another decade of trying to make alcohol go away, Americans would wise up and regulate alcohol. Guys like these would then continue the prohibition fight against other drugs. It’s 92 years later and more than two million Americans are behind bars. Keep on keeping on!

    [Enlarged version here. Taken from Shorpy.com]

  • Guns don’t kill people…

    …people with guns who can’t get laid kill people.

    Can somebody tell me why we won’t discuss legal prostitution in this country?

    The gunmanis believed to be Elliot Rodger, 22, who in a YouTube video said he was sexually frustrated and about to go on “a mission of retribution.””

    In severalRodger referred to himself as an incel (involuntary celibate)”

  • Two more prohibition deaths

    These twodidn’t die from MDMA. They died from whatever they took that wasn’t MDMA. Why? Because of prohibition.

    To blame drugs rather than prohibition is exactly the same as when, during Prohibition, “alcohol” caused blindness, death, and (my own favorite) Jake Leg. These are prohibition problems. Of course during Prohibition, prohibitionists blamed the prohibited drug rather than their policy of prohibition. They still do.

    If you’re not ready to end drug prohibition, how about testing booths? Testing booths would have saved these two lives. Clubs in Europe have them. But no, not here. You’d get arrested. Why? Because we want our drug users to buy from criminals and die. I mean, seriously, we don’t have a system that prevents recreational drug users from dying because prohibitionists, perhaps yourself included, say: “it sends the wrong message!” Because preventable death is such a good message. For shame.

    Every weekend, throughout the world, countless hundreds of thousands of people take recreational drugs, have a good time, and live to tell about it. The fact that anybody dies from taking what they think is ecstasy is as absurd (and real) as partial permanent paralysis from a shot of booze.

  • Cockfight raid in N.M.

    Police in Deming, N.M. raided a cockfight. People ran away. Birds, live and dead, were recovered. How much you wanna bet the live birds will now be killed?

    It’s not like I get too worked up over it either way, but I think it’s a shame that New Mexico banned cockfighting in 2007. It was something special about the state and there is a long tradition of cockfighting that predates New Mexico’s entry into the United States. Hell, it predates the United States!

    Here’s the state’s Q & A on banning cockfighting. It’s actually a pretty good Q & A, but I’m not convinced by any of it.

    Plus, there’s not too much going on in Deming “Home of pure water and fast ducks” New Mexico. And fighting cocks is better the cooking meth. If guys want to raise beautiful birds and bet on them while they kill each other? Fine by me. Besides, I’ve bet at a cockfight. I didn’t understand all of it. But clearly these people cared deeply about it. And it was kind of beautiful.

    I’d prefer to be fighting cock than a Perdue Chicken.