Category: Police

  • Q & A

    A while back I was asked to do a little Q & A by Jeanette over at Cat5 Commerce. She puts together original content for such sites as BDU.com, Tactical.com and my own personal favorite, TacticalPants.com. She asked me so nicely (nothing like the combination of politeness, a personal non-form letter, and flattery) I couldn’t say no. And no, I neither asked for nor received free tactical pants (or anything else). The original interview appears here.

    Not only do you run a popular police blog, but in 2008 you penned a critically acclaimed book about your life as Baltimore cop. What compelled you to start sharing all these experiences?

    The unromantic reason I wrote my book is that if you don’t publish as a new college professor, you get fired! But I do hope I tell a good story about policing. It’s too bad that more police officers don’t write.

    Have you always been a writer?

    Both my parents are good editors and my father wrote a bunch of books. So maybe it’s in the blood. In my mind, I really started writing when I started working for the Evanstonian, my high-school paper. It’s when people read what you write and think about what you wrote that you realize it can actually be fun. My favorite writing is still an 800-word newspaper op-ed. But writing is hard work. Blog entries are pretty painless. And answering these questions is fun! But I think a dirty secret to writing is that nobody actually likes it. Sure, it’s nice to have written. But the actually process is no fun. In fact, there’s almost nothing I wouldn’t prefer to do.

    It took seven years after I quit the police department to finish Cop in the Hood. That comes out to 27 words a day. Of course it doesn’t work that way (and it wasn’t all I was doing for seven years). But when I think about my productively as a writer, it’s kind of depressing.

    Being a professor requires that you write. But it’s a different game if you get paid every other week regardless, I tip my hat to those who write for a living. It’s not easy.

    What’s one story everyone will remember from your book and/or blog?

    What we as police find funny usually disgusts more normal people (and often for good reason). All good police stories involve the misfortune of somebody. And the good ones usually throw in a couple internal organs spilled out. I quickly learned that these stories don’t go over too well with non-police. Rather than come away with a single story, I hope people will find my book a good read all the way through. Only then might we see the wisdom of Fat Albert’s line: “if you’re not careful you might learn something before it’s done!”

    What I find interesting is that different people take away different stories. I’ve had various people list every single chapter as their favorite. Maybe there really is something for everybody.

    Is anybody in the book mad at you?

    Not that I know of. When I wrote the book I was worried that some of what I say and quote would piss off people I like. The only people that criticized me are a few crusty old retired cops. They say they won’t read my book on principle (I’m not certain what principle that is.) I only wish some of them would write their own stories. They have so much more experience and knowledge of policing than I do. I think I’m a quick learner, but I wasn’t there for long. Regardless, the feedback from police has been very positive. That surprises me because there are a lot of quotes, taken out of context, that could make them look bad. But I think I get away with it because the book is honest, regardless of what people think of me and my position that drugs need to be regulated.

    It doesn’t seem like it’s asking too much, but it’s hard to find a simple honest portrayal of police officers on patrol.

    Did your partners know you were writing a book? Did they accept you?

    I was upfront and open about everything from day one. At first, some were naturally suspicious (as they should be!). But I got surprisingly little flack from police about being a Harvard student and planning to write a book. I think police are good judges of character. I won’t pretend that everybody loved me. But on the street I did my job. And that’s what counts most.

    What’s one piece of tactical gear that’s helped you time and time again?

    My Streamline Stinger flashlight. When I was worked the midnight shift, it was essential, of course. But even now I still use the flashlight around the house. And with a little velcro block attachment, it’s the world’s best bike headlight. I got a new LED Stinger recently. I love how it lasts for hours on one charge.

    You are got a doctorate in sociology from Harvard and now teach at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Do you find many undergraduates wooed by those CSI crime-solving montages?

    Yeah. Too many. CSI has not helped the real world of policing. But it has gotten more people interested in law enforcement, which I guess is a good thing. At least The Wirehas the added benefit of being filmed on the streets of Baltimore I policed and wrote about. The Wireis a lot more realistic, but even that’s not perfect.

    What’s something you learned on the street that could never be taught in a classroom?

    There’s almost nothing you learn on the street that can be taught in a classroom. Seriously. But there are a lot of things you can learn in the classroom that you can apply to the street. You don’t need a fancy education to be a good cop. But I believe a good education makes you a better cop.

    What makes your blog different from all the other police blogs out there?

    There are a few good police blogs out there and I think they all share honesty and a bit of a critical eye. The original goal of my blog was just to shill for my book, but now the blog has kind of taken off on its own. Ultimately, my goal is to make policing better. I like to ask, “how can policing be better” rather than just pointing out what is wrong. You can be critical of policing and still be pro-police.

    But what I think makes copinthehood.com unique is that it brings together a much broader readership than most blogs do. I write for and hear from readers who normally wouldn’t even talk to each other, much less listen to what others have to say.

    The only way you’ll ever learn is if you question your own beliefs. And in hearing from my readers, I certainly have to think about and question my own beliefs. I like that.

    What’s next for you?

    I’m working on a book that proposes flogging as an alternative to prison. My conservative police friends already think I’m crazy because of my liberal beliefs. Now my liberal friends will think I’m crazy, too!

    [I’m still on vacation, this post was scheduled to run in advance]

  • Baltimore Mayor Dixon Resigns

    News travels, even to Bangkok. The story in the Sun.

    And while I’m at it, here’s a story about Commissioner Bealefeld wanting more foot patrol. Maybe he read my piece on foot patrol, “Angels in Blue: The Virtues of Foot Patrol.”

  • Being a professor is a better job

    “Most days I don’t miss being a cop; being a professor is a better job.” And so begins the thrilling story of Cop in the Hood.

    Providing further evidence in support of this hypothesis, I’ll be on vacation for the next three weeks in Thailand and Bali.

    Happy New Year!

    And of all nights to stay safe, tonight is the big one. Please don’t get hit by any bullets, falling or otherwise.

  • And now you know… the rest of the story!

    Fatal stabbing suspect Cyan Brown, 16, was the aggressor in Christmas Eve New York subway fracas, police say.

    This happened in an area I go through a lot. The original reports said: poor girl “fondled” by group of bad men and stabbed one in self defense. The cop in me knew that wasn’t the whole story (when will reporters ever learn?). The truth is never (or almost never) that simple. Now the real story seems to be coming out.

    The account in the New York Daily News.

  • Murders down again in NYC

    Murders down again in NYC

    Illustrating once again that crime and the economy are not inherently linked. The storyin the New York Times.

  • Taser shock in the courts!

    The 9th U.S. Court of Appeals (never known for its pro-police views) to be precise.

    This perhaps landmark decision has been called, “The clearest and most complete statements yet from an appellate court about the limits of Taser use.”

    From the story by Hudson Sangree and Kim Minugh in the Sacramento Bee.

    In the summer of 2005, Carl Bryan, 21, was pulled over for a seat-belt violation and did not follow an officer’s order to stay in the car.

    During his second traffic stop in Coronado, he got out of the car. He was “agitated … yelling gibberish and hitting his thighs, clad only in his boxer shorts and tennis shoes” but did not threaten the officer verbally or physically, the judges wrote.

    That’s when Coronado Police Officer Brian McPherson, who was standing about 20 feet away watching Bryan’s “bizarre tantrum,” fired his Taser, the court said.

    Without a word of warning, he hit Bryan in the arm with two metal darts, delivering a 1,200-volt jolt.

    Temporarily paralyzed and in intense pain, Bryan fell face-first on the pavement. The fall shattered four of his front teeth and left him with facial abrasions and swelling. Later, a doctor had to use a scalpel to remove one of the darts.

    McPherson could have waited for backup or tried to talk the man down, the judges said. If Bryan was mentally ill, as the officer contended, then there was even more reason to use “less intrusive means,” the judges said.

    “Officer McPherson’s desire to quickly and decisively end an unusual and tense situation is understandable,” Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw wrote for the court. “His chosen method for doing so violated Bryan’s constitutional right to be free from excessive force.”

    The court decision is here.

    I think it’s a very good decision, but I wish they had done so without hanging the officer out to dry. McPherson could end up in jail and lose his home. That’s not right.

    The court wrote:

    If an officer’s use of force was “premised on a reasonable belief that such force was lawful,” the officer will be granted immunity from suit, notwithstanding the fact excessive force was deployed.

    A reasonable officer in these circumstances would have known that it was unreasonable to deploy intermediate force.

    Where an officer’s conduct so clearly offends an individual’s constitutional rights, we do not need to find closely analogous case law to show that a right is clearly established.

    No reasonable officer confronting a situation where the need for force is at its lowest—where the target is a nonviolent, stationary misdemeanant twenty feet away—would have concluded that deploying intermediate force without warning was justified. We thus hold that Officer McPherson’s use of significant force in these circumstances does not constitute a “reasonable mistake” of either fact or law. … Officer McPherson is therefore not entitled to qualified immunity for his use of the Taser X26 against Bryan.

    Ouch.

    How can the court say that “no reasonable officer” would conclude that force was justified? I’m reasonable (and against such Taser use) and I think what he did, prior to this decision, was legal! Given all the tasering incidents going on, it seems pretty obvious that many if not most officers would do exactly what McPherson did. Using a Taser in compliance situations has become standard operating procedure. That’s what needs to change. This is a problem of policy and training, not one sadistic cop!

  • Terror Suspect

    So what’s the lesson with this guy? Seriously.

    It’s damn hard to stop people from doing harm if they’re willing to kill themselves… but that’s no real answer.

    Here’s one of many stories.

    [poor Nigeria, their rep was bad enough with simply internet scams!]

    [update:] Maybe it’s this, from David Brooks’ column in the New York Times.

    At some point, it’s worth pointing out that it wasn’t the centralized system that stopped terrorism in this instance. As with the shoe bomber, as with the plane that went down in Shanksville, Pa., it was decentralized citizen action. The plot was foiled by nonexpert civilians who had the advantage of the concrete information right in front of them — and the spirit to take the initiative.

    For better or worse, over the past 50 years we have concentrated authority in centralized agencies and reduced the role of decentralized citizen action.

  • Tooting Other People’s Horns

    Two of the best police books out there are little read. Too little read.

    And top-quality and much more action packed than my book.

    I’ve written about both these books before, but it can’t hurt writing about them again.

    Beyond Hope? by Michael East is about policing in Saginaw, Michigan. Unless you live in Saginaw, you probably won’t find it in book stores, but you can buy it here. Beyond Hope? is one of those few books written by an active police officer under his real name. But East doesn’t pull any punches.

    The other is another book about the Eastern District. But his experience was very different from mine. Badges, Bullets, & Bars by Danny Shanahan.

    They’re both great books. I haven’t met either of the authors. But both know more about policing than I do. And they write well. What more could you ask for?

  • Calls for Drug Legalization in Mexico

    From the Wall Street Journal:

    Growing numbers of Mexican and U.S. officials say—at least privately—that the biggest step in hurting the business operations of Mexican cartels would be simply to legalize their main product: marijuana. Long the world’s most popular illegal drug, marijuana accounts for more than half the revenues of Mexican cartels.

    “Economically, there is no argument or solution other than legalization, at least of marijuana,” said the top Mexican official matter-of-factly. The official said such a move would likely shift marijuana production entirely to places like California, where the drug can be grown more efficiently and closer to consumers. “Mexico’s objective should be to make the U.S. self-sufficient in marijuana,” he added with a grin.

    He is not alone in his views. Earlier this year, three former Latin American presidents known for their free-market and conservative credentials–Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico, Cesar Gaviria of Colombia and Fernando Henrique Cardoso of Brazil–said governments should seriously consider legalizing marijuana as an effective tool against murderous drug gangs.

  • Merry Christmas

    Especially to those men and women working.