Copinthehood.com has moved to qualitypolicing.com

  • Officer Pete says (rule 21):

    If you want to kill somebody, go right up and shoot him in the head. Otherwise you never know where those bullets can go.

  • In the name of research

    The man behind the famous Stanford Prison Experiment, Dr. Phillip Zimbardo, is examining how people view altruism and heroism. Help his research by completing an online questionnaire at http://www.socialpsychresearch.org.

    There are six screens of questions (I hate when they don’t tell you when it will end). It takes about 10 min. What do you get out of it? Well, nothing perhaps. But in the end I enjoyed thinking about the differences between heroism and altruism.

    And I promise you won’t get locked up.

  • Man bites dog?

    One of the stranger headlines appears in today’s Sun: City infant was not hit by bullet, police say.

  • Officer Pete says (rule 22):

    Please don’t shoot your guns up in the air. It scares the neighbors.

  • Never lose sight…

    I received this email today. It’s worth reading. I wish all police officers wrote so well. I wish all my students wrote so well. Too bad he’s not my student.

    Some small police department’s gain was surely Baltimore’s loss.

    I recently finished the first chapter of your book, Cop in the Hood and found it to be completely on point with my experiences as a Baltimore City police officer. I ordered it online and cannot wait to read it cover to cover. I also read your work, “Two Shades of Blue.” As for me, I am a white […] conservative male […] hired by the Baltimore City Police after graduating college with a Bachelor’s in criminal justice. As of 2007, I am enrolled in graduate school while working full-time in a small police department in Pennsylvania.
    […]
    Baltimore City left an indelible mark on my personal and professional opinion of urban life and policing. I will treasure the time I worked in the city for I will never experience it again. You have put to paper what I have so inadequately attempted to express to people about life as a Baltimore City police officer and life in the “ghetto.” Unless experienced firsthand, no one can fathom what it is like to be an officer there.

    Over the course of my time in the city, I was involved in over 550 drug arrests, mainly crack cocaine and heroin. […] I laugh sometimes when I contrast the massive amount of arrests I made in Baltimore […] with the incidents I deal with now. Working in a small area, I am perpetually bored with the “crime” (underage drinking, broken windows, and loud music) I encounter. […] Needless to say, I miss being “a real cop.”

    Aside from being a fellow officer, there is a particular reason why you have my gained my respect. […] I have a great deal of respect for academia (I myself am working towards my Master’s), but after going through college and spending 4 years in Baltimore, I realize those professors, outside of their office, are limited in their knowledge of actual police work. I learned this as soon as I hit the streets. Among the topics I once was taught and naively believed to be true include community policing and the drug war. I believe, as so many others, community policing is ineffective and the drug war will never be won.

    I have particular respect for you because you lived what you researched. You teach and write from experience. I believe if you are to teach on a subject, you must have real world experience and a good knowledge base. Obviously this is my opinion and I mean no disrespect to any colleagues of yours or to any other person in academia. But I believe this to be true, especially since so few venture into police work. Even though you were on the street a little over a year, one year spent in the city is a career anywhere else.

    I appreciate the candor in your work and I look forward to reading more of your literature. Keep up the good work and please never lose sight of what those officers, and all police for that matter, do on a daily basis. Thank you for your time.

    No, sir, thank you!

  • Community Policing query

    Dear Prof. Moskos

    First off, let me say that I enjoyed your book. As someone who has recently moved to Baltimore and now finds themselves living on the edge of the Eastern I found it a fascinating read. Your discussion of 911 helped to explain the very big difference in reaction between the community meetings.

    Commanders (not a direct quote) “We won’t know something is happening unless you call 911 and tell us. We can’t do anything about it if you don’t tell us.”—911 operators “You’ve got transvestite hookers working in the park across the street? We can’t do anything about it unless you call when one of them is getting into a car.”

    Even without my new context, “Cop in the Hood” would have been an interesting book. I appreciate how you are able to speak with two voices; both the police and the sociologist.

    That out of the way, I have a question I would appreciate your opinion on: are citizen’s patrols actually effective? I’ve made some minor forays into the literature and searched for opinions. Although community policing generally seems to have a positive effect in some studies, I can’t find anything pointing to which aspect(s) is effective.

    At a gut level I have a cynical reaction to the overall effect of having a random group of neighbors walking around the area in green vests and waving the occasional flashlight at a dark corner. Keep in mind that I live in Greenmount West straddling the border between the Eastern and Central, so we have to communicate with 2 separate districts. This seems to reduce the level of direct contact with anyone who we have direct contact with.

    I’m very interested in your viewpoint…

    I answer:

    Living between two police districts really does make things worse. And having to deal with a different set of officers on two different blocks is a pain. There is a natural tendency for police officers to push problems (such as prostitution) “away.” I certainly pushed some people away from the Eastern and back into the Southeast. Counterproductive, when you consider I lived in the Southeast.

    Community policing, by and large, doesn’t exist and never has. It was supposed to mark a move away from reactive policing. But despite lip service to the contrary (I mean, nobody will ever come out againstcommunity policing), I don’t think any police department has every implemented a real long-term community policing program. Quite simply, you can’t have community policing if patrol officers are sitting in cars waiting for radio calls.

    About citizen patrols… I don’t know. My thought is that they can be effective (both directly and indirectly). It really is community policing. That’s good, right? But for all the effort put in, the gain is probably very very small.

    I’m a big fan of the Guardian Angels, for instance. But that’s more from the perspective of being a young guy very happy to see them on the Chicago L than from any actually academic proof that they prevent crime. Buy my guess is that they dohelp prevent crime from a Broken Windows perspective. And even if the Guardian Angels (or other citizen groups) don’t prevent crime, at least they made me feel safer. That’s worth something.

    District Commanders in Baltimore tended not to be the most enlightened bunch. (At least from my experience back in 2000. I’m sure they’re all much better now.) Getting police to move away from rapid response and toward foot patrol in not in their genetic DNA. They’re right that they won’t know until you call 911. So the question they and you should be asking them is why don’t they know and what can theydo to know better.

    And that 911 operator is an idiot. Just call for disorderly then, to get police to respond. But even better would be to talk to your post officer (on any of the three shifts, but the midnight is probably the best because we had more time) and talk to him or her about ways to solve the problem. As a police officer, I would much prefer to help a real person than just respond to another anonymous 911 call for prostitution. What the cops can do is arrest. And some arresting is probably part of the solution here. But probably just one piece of the solution.

    Interestingly, there weren’t many street-walking prostitutes in the Eastern when I was there. My guess is it was too dangerous for prostitutes and Johns alike.

  • Losing the drug war

    You probably heard about the mass of San Diego State University students arrested for drug dealing. That college students take drugs shouldn’t be a big surprise for anybody who went to college. College students drink, too. Nor, if it weren’t for the guns involved, would I see it as a big problem.

    The far more worrisome news comes from Mexico. On May 8, the acting chief of Mexico’s police force was assassinated by drug gangs. That’s huge. We don’t have an equivalent of that position here. This is the chief of all police for all of Mexico.

    On May 10, The number two policeman in Ciudad Jauarez was killed. The sixth senior policeman killed in Mexico this week.

    The war on the drugs is not being won.

    Killing police chiefs is not a sign of desperation and defeat. It’s a high-stakes sign of domination and control. God bless any non-corrupt police officers in Mexico. Would I risk my life for paltry pay to fight the war on the drugs? No.

    To me, 75 college students–idiot frat boys, mostly–getting arrested for drug dealing is funny.

    Drug dealers defeating the police force of Mexico is not funny. It is entirely possible that drug cartels will take over the Mexican police and to some extent, the entire elected government.

    Losing Mexico is a price way too high to pay for the privilege of continuing to fight the endless war on drugs. Especially when the solution–legal drug regulation and an end to drug prohibition–is so simple.

  • You can ask my man right here with the broken neck

    911 is a joke. We should all know that by now. If patrol officers didn’t have to always be ready to answer the next bullshit call, they could do a lot more to prevent crime. I’ve written about this.

    I’ve always argued that while rapid response doesn’t make sense for police, it does for ambos and fire trucks. David Kohn writes in the Baltimore Sun that there are problems with repeat 911 for ambulances as well. One person called for an ambo every third day:

    Baltimore’s busy public ambulance service went out on more than 150,000 calls last year, responding to everything from car accidents to heart attacks. About 2,000 of those calls were from the same 91 people.

    “We want to get these people better healthcare so they don’t call 911 so much,” said Dr. Joshua M. Sharfstein, Baltimore’s commissioner of health.

    I’d like to give people better police serviceso they don’t call 911 so much.

    One woman in my sector called police at least 600 times a year. She’d call a couple times a day starting around 5am when she got up to sweep the street. She called for drug dealing. She was right. There was drug dealing. It’s just too bad we couldn’t really do anything about it. Not with her calling 911 so much.

  • Officer Pete says (rule 23):

    Always wear your seatbelt when you drive. It really does protect you.

  • Can you get away with murder?

    Most of the time.

    The City Paper is starting to look into homicides to see what actually happens in the Hall of Justice. Sometimes somebody gets put away. Most of the times, not.

    I was turned onto this by the unfortunately fascinating Baltimore Crime Blog.