Tag: In Defense of Flogging

  • End Mass Shootings? The Four-Percent Solution.

    Of the twenty-five worst shootings in the US since 1994 only one was committed by an African American. The vast majority of shootings, twenty-two of twenty-five, were committed by whites and Asians. And these are the two groups most underrepresented in our criminal justice system.

    It’s entirely conceivable that African-Americans are underrepresented in the annals of mass murders because of mass incarceration. If you’re dangerous, emotionally disturbed, and a young black man, there’s a very good chance you’re already behind bars. Prisons are already the largest provider, albeit an extremely incompetent one, of mental health services in the US. More massive incarceration could prevent mass shootings because, well, if you cast a wide-enough net, you’re bound to catch a fish or two.

    President Obama recently said, “if we can save the life of even one child, then we have a responsibility to act.” Indeed, so let us be bold and incarcerate five million white men.

    All we would need to do is identify, through police and the courts, the poorest, most desperate, and most troubled four percent of white men — roughly the percentage of black men presently incarcerated — and lock them up. Thanks to drug prohibition, law breakers are not in short supply. It’s just a matter of cracking down on whites like we’ve done to blacks.

    The cost of keeping the rest of us safe, by housing five million prisoners, is but $150 billion per year, or the equivalent of the budget of the US Navy. But spent wisely, by focusing incarceration on the jobless, as we do, overnight we could cut the unemployment rate in half!

    Along with taking five million potential criminals off the streets, one million new correctional officers would be needed to guard so many white men. Think of the boost to poor, rural, prison-hungry communities. And this doesn’t even count the additional jobs in court, police, and probation related fields.

    Of course… even if it would reduce mass shootings and provide jobs, we won’t and shouldn’t lock up four percent of any population. The moral and financial devastation of such a gulag far outweighs any possible benefit. But, so why then do we lock up four percent of African-American men and have the largest prison system in the world?

    Even without locking up one more person, we already have the largest incarceration system in the world. In rate and numbers, we lock up more people than any country in the world. Ever. We have more prisoners than China, and they have one billion more people.

    Were we to expand our incarceration levels to, in effect, level the playing field for whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians, the incomprehensible failings of the status quo would be readily apparent.

    Are Americans such an evil people that we need to lock up so many? Are so many prisons necessary for public safety? Of course not. We got into this mess after 1970, when we decided that the war on drugs and longer sentences were the answer. Historically our country has had its fair share of moral failings, often related to race. More than two million people behind bars reflects American society — all of America — no less than did slavery and segregation.

    This is not about “them,” the prisoners; it is about us.

    To bring our incarceration rate back not just to world standards but to where it was for most of American history, eighty percent of all prisoners would need to be freed. That won’t be easy, but again, the norm in America was to lock up one person per 1,000, not, as we do, seven.

    The good news is that prisons can be closed without increasing crime. Take New York City: Last year there were 414 murders in the city; in 1990, there were more than two thousand. Were all the potential murderers locked up? Quite the contrary. During these two decades, while the city’s population increased by more than a million, the number of incarcerated New Yorkers actually substantially decreased.

    Of course my four-percent proposal is a Swiftian ploy. Luckily the solution of fewer prisoners could also reduce shootings. More palatable options are, in fact, plentiful. We can provide mental health services for those in need. We can restrict gun possession while fully respecting Second Amendment rights. We can expand punishments that don’t involve jail. We can establish a social safety net for all. If we want to stop violence and prison, these are exactly what we have to do. Anger, fear, and retribution only make the problem worse. They’re also not in the best spirit of our exceptional national character.

    Originally published by the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences in ACJS Today, Vol 38(2), March, 2013

  • Don’t buy this essay!

    Wow. You can buy an essay about my book, In Defense of Flogging.

    But it’s not very good. Really. It’s surprisingly crappy. Mostly because it’s not about me book. I would expect more for my money. On the other hand, this does appear to be free.

  • Flogging Gains Steam

    There’s a bill to bring back corporal punishment(seemingly in lieu of incarceration) in Montana. It ain’t gonna happen, but still…

    Speaking of which, did I mention — gosh, no, I didn’t think I did — that In Defense of Flogging is out in paperback? Already? Where does time go? You might be thinking, “So light. So tidy. So cheap. Such a pretty orange cover. It actually fits in my pocket!”

    So why don’t you go and buy a copy? It got rave reviews, and yet you didn’t buy it. Because you were waiting for the paperback. So now is your chance!

    It’s only $12.59!

  • “Peter Moskos doesn’t bullshit”

    Check this out by Michael Corbin in Baltimore’s City Paper: Better of Two Evils. Makes me sound like such a intellectual bad-ass. And potty mouth. Fuckin’-A!

    Seriously though, it is very powerfully written. Makes me want to re-read my own books.

  • A most fabulous correction

    From Salon.com, regarding an interview they did with me:

    The June 20, 2011, story “Could Flogging Solve Our Prison Crisis” initially stated that “the Corrections Corporation of America helped draft anti-immigration laws,” a reference to the draft legislation that later became Arizona SB 1070. CCA has brought it to our attention that although CCA did have a representative at the ALEC meeting where model legislation similar to 1070 was drafted, CCA was not involved in drafting the language. The story has been corrected. [Correction made 3/8/12]

    Of course. Their man sat quietly the whole time playing solitaire. I regret the error.

  • Couldn’t have said it better myself! (II)

    So after an email correspondence with an editor at The New Yorker, they responded at length and denied pretty much everything: “The particular facts and comparisons you cite…don’t seem specific to your work.” Really? I beg to differ. But what can I do?

    I still think Adam Gopnik needed to cite me in the magazine.

    Gopnik now says rather nice things about In Defense of Flogging online. Had he just done so in the article, parts of which were, so, let us say, “inspired,” by my writing, I would be pleased instead of pissed. And despite Gopnik’s ever-modest insistence, he does manage to “unpack” my argument rather well:

    Peter Moskos’s In Defense of Flogging … depends on an extended analogy, difficult to unpack in summary form. Moskos, a professor of law (and, not incidentally, a former Baltimore police officer) both does mean his “case for flogging”–he thinks that the system is so rotten than even restoring the cat would be better–and rather strongly, I think, doesn’t mean it. He doesn’t really want to flog the evil out of prisoners. He wants to flog the indifference out of the rest of us. Moskos (who, I’m informed, seems to have coined the phrase “natural rate of incarceration”) rightly calls prisons “an insidious marriage of entombment and torture,” and his provocative book makes many sanely provocative points; it is one I’ve urged on those who want to do more reading on the subject, and I’d urge it again now.

    I’m sure glad Gopnik liked my book. I’m also sure it would have saved a lot of hassle had he just said so earlier.

    [Also, just FYI, I’m not a professor of law. Never have been. Never taken a law class in my life. The confusion comes from the name of my department: “The Department of Law, Police Science, and Criminal Justice Administration.” Call me a criminologist or a sociologist or, if you must, a professor of police science.]

  • Couldn’t have said it better myself!

    Couldn’t have said it better myself!

    They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I was flattered enough to send this letter to the New Yorker:

    To the Editor,

    As a long-time New Yorker subscriber, I was thrilled to see Adam Gopnik’s recent article, “The Caging of America.” I appreciate Mr. Gopnik bringing this important subject to the attention of the New Yorker’s readers (and I couldn’t agree more with his overall points).

    Incarceration is a theme I am quite interested in. So much so, in fact, that I wrote a book on the subject, In Defense of Flogging (Basic Books, 2011). Mr. Gopnik may have come across my book in the course of his research as it seems to me that he referenced my book numerous times in his article.

    Perhaps I am too familiar with the subject, but many of his phrases bear a uncomfortable resemblance to my own published work (examples follow). At the very least, it would have been nice to be acknowledged.

    Sincerely,
    Professor Peter Moskos
    John Jay College of Criminal Justice

    1) The US prison/Soviet gulag comparison.

    “The Caging of America”: Over all, there are now more people under “correctional supervision” in America—more than six million—than were in the Gulag Archipelago under Stalin at its height.
    In Defense of Flogging: Stalin, at the height of the Soviet gulag, had fewer prisoners than America.

    2) The US City of Incarceration.
    “The Caging of America”: That city of the confined and the controlled, Lockuptown, is now the second largest in the United States.
    In Defense of Flogging: If we condensed our nationwide penal system into a single city, it would be the fourth largest city in America, with a population more than Baltimore, Boston, and San Francisco combined.

    3) The baseball stadium analogy.

    “The Caging of America”: Every day, at least fifty thousand men—a full house at Yankee Stadium—wake in solitary confinement.
    In Defense of Flogging: At a sold-out baseball game in Chicago, forty-one thousand people can watch the Cubs at Wrigley Field. Two-point-three million is more than fifty-six sold-out ballgames.

    4) The bathroom.

    “The Caging of America”: (Lock yourself in your bathroom and then imagine you have to stay there for the next ten years, and you will have some sense of the experience.)

    In Defense of Flogging: Consider one California inmates account of prison life: “I live in a bathroom with another man, rarely see my loved ones, I’m surrounded by killers and thieves.”

    5) Rape as comic fodder.

    “The Caging of America”: More than seventy thousand prisoners are raped each year—that it is routinely held out as a threat, part of the punishment to be expected. The subject is standard fodder for comedy.

    In Defense of Flogging: Approximately one in twenty prison inmates say they’ve been sexually assaulted by other inmates or staff in the past year…. And yet we still joke about prison rape. … comedian Chris Rock popularized an account.

    6) Prisoners as disappeared.

    “The Caging of America”:We lock men up and forget about their existence.

    In Defense of Flogging: Troublesome people are out of sight and out of mind—picked up off the street and all but disappeared.

    7) Marion prison lockdown.

    “The Caging of America”: Then, in 1983, inmates at the maximum-security federal prison in Marion, Illinois, murdered two guards. Inmates had been (very occasionally) killing guards for a long time, but the timing of the murders, and the fact that they took place in a climate already prepared to believe that even ordinary humanity was wasted on the criminal classes, meant that the entire prison was put on permanent lockdown. A century and a half after absolute solitary first appeared in American prisons, it was reintroduced.

    In Defense of Flogging: Things changed, however, in 1983, when inmates in Marion Prison killed two guards in two separate incidents on the same day. Marion immediately went on lockdown and remained there—for the next twenty-three years…. Reincarnated after nearly a century’s absence, the concept of near-total isolation spread from Marion, Illinois, to the world.

    8) Drug offenders to embezzlers.

    “The Caging of America”:Neither the streets nor the society is made safer by having marijuana users or peddlers locked up, let alone with the horrific sentences now dispensed so easily. For that matter, no social good is served by having the embezzler or the Ponzi schemer locked in a cage for the rest of his life, rather than having him bankrupt and doing community service in the South Bronx for the next decade or two.

    In Defense of Flogging: Certainly mere drug offenders should not be kept in prison, nor should white-collar criminals. Bernard Madoff, famously convicted in 2009 for running a massive Ponzi scheme, is being incarcerated and costing the public even more money. Why? He’s no threat to society.

    9) “Natural rate of incarceration”

    “The Caging of America”: The natural rate of incarceration seems to hover right around a hundred men per hundred thousand people.

    In Defense of Flogging: We might consider 100 per 100,000 a somewhat “natural” rate of incarceration. [A phrase I believe I coined.]

    And in case you’re wondering, this image has been blatantly stolen from Gawker.

     

    Follow up post

  • Favorite Books of 2011

    One of Mother Jones’s favorite books of 2011 is In Defense of Flogging.

    It makes a fabulous Christmas stocking stuffer, for all you Old Calendarists out there (just 10 shopping days left).

  • Flog It

    Neil Steinberg wrote a good review of In Defense of Flogging in my old home-town Chicago Sun-Times.

    I’m particularly impressed that caught what I thought was obvious:

    Moskos has brilliantly used the old PR trick of marrying a complex, off-putting topic to a fascinating one. If you want to trick people into reading about penal reform, brandish a whip. And be brief.

    Steinberg goes on:

    In Defense of Flogging is 154 pages long. I read it in less than a day, and it is an eloquent cry to address a problem that we spend billions of dollars trying to ignore. “We’ve run out of options,” Moskos writes. “What we have in America is a massive, terrifying and out-of-control experiment in incarceration.”

    There’s no arguing about that.

  • Brave Thinkers of the Year

    Brave Thinkers of the Year


    The Atlantic’s annual list of Brave Thinkers just came out. I’m in it (and with some pretty impressive company)!

    Mind you, this doesn’t actually mean I’m a goodthinker… just a brave one.